[Told you sooooo] Attention Economics Pricing In Advertising: Cost Per Second

Attention Economics Pricing In Advertising: Cost Per Second

Email This Post

 Email This Post
October 19, 2010 ??? 12:09 am

Data-Driven Thinking“Data Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and containing fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Matt Shanahan, SVP of Strategy for Scout Analytics.

Engagement is the unit of monetization in the ad world, yet engagement is not what is bought and sold in online advertising. Instead ad placements are priced and sold based on impressions. Whether that impression lasts 1 second, 1 minute, or 10 minutes, the price of the impression is the same which doesn’t make sense in attention economics.

The reality is an audience member is not likely to consider an advertisement until the publisher has truly caught his or her attention, i.e., until the person is engaged. Consider an interstitial advertisement that comes up between a search result click and viewing the content. The audience member is interested first and foremost in figuring out if the content is even relevant. There is little or no chance that person is willing to sit through an ad when they don’t even know if the content is relevant. If the audience member does make it to the page, the person will quickly scan the content to determine relevancy. If it is irrelevant, guess what, the person moves on without considering the ads that were served. If, on the other hand, the content is relevant, the person will spend time on the page and often considers contextual content provided, e.g., relevant ads and referenced content. Think about it in other forms of media whether TV, print, radio, or live events, the producer gets the audience engaged and then inserts the advertising.

In many ways, an online publisher is penalized for providing a highly engaged audience member to an advertiser. If the publisher creates an engaging article that is actually read, the publisher gets revenue from an impression but maybe not from a second impression. This gives rise to publishers that game the system by chopping up the content into multiple clicks to create more impressions but that hurts engagement.

Stop the madness. Stop selling impressions. Advertisers, publishers, and audience members alike are better off buying and selling advertisements based on seconds of engagement. For an advertiser, buying seconds of engagement means the quality of the impression is greatly increased and the attention getting opportunity has better probability. Selling engagement means a publisher can be rewarded for the length of time they create for the advertiser (i.e., merit-based revenue). For the audience members, they get a better more engaging experience rather than SEO optimized, click-gamed sites.

Engagement is measurable and predictable. Every audience member has a pattern of behavior regarding frequency, context, and visit length. An audience member can be tracked and predicted as to how frequently they return daily, weekly, monthly, etc. The audience member can be tracked and predicted as to why they return such as topic, breaking news, author, etc. And of course, the audience length of visit can be tracked and predicted.

Because it engagement is measurable and predictable, it can be inventoried and sold. Cost per second (CPS = CPM*1000/expected length of engagement) becomes the price of a delivered advertisement. CPS rewards publishers for creating engagement rather than impressions.

Why is CPS important to publishers? Revenue optimization. At any given point, the revenue capacity of a publisher is limited by the audience size. Yes, the audience can be built overtime but that is overtime. No the audience size cannot be infinite so there is a limit. Like it or not the vast majority of audiences are niche. In a revenue capacity constrained model, maximizing revenue per unit is the key to success. Impressions reduce the number of units a publisher has to sell. Engagement increase the number of units. Given engagement is the unit of monetization, engagement is what publishers need to sell. Engagement is finer grained than impressions and therefore can provide revenue optimization opportunities.

Why is CPS important to advertisers? More control. Using CPS, advertisers can control the quality of the purchased ad placement. Right now, insertion orders are governed by CPM and minimum impressions and maximum spend. In the CPS world, an advertiser would specify, CPS, minimum impressions, maximum impressions, and maximum spend. Essentially, giving advertisers control on length of time for their impression.

Why is CPS important to audience members? Return on time. Quality experience and content relevance are the ingredients that make an engaged audience member. CPS incents publishers to make the investments that benefit audience members.

CPM is the wrong pricing in attention economics. It promotes revenue activities that are not beneficial to advertisers or audience members. CPS is the right pricing in attention economics. CPS aligns the motivations of publishers, advertisers, and audience members alike.

Follow Scout Analytics (@ScoutAnalytics) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Share It!

Add to digg

Add to Facebook

Add to Google Bookmarks

http://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/attention-economics/” title=”Add to Twitter” rel=”nofollow”>Add to Twitter

Email Th
is Post

 Email This Post
October 19, 2010 ??? 12:09 am

event though it’s should be just a start


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s